AI's content use battles: What you need to know
28 Dec 2023 · over 2 years ago

- OpenAI's business model relies on unfettered access to copyrighted material, but it is not crucial for society to allow it for free.
- The New York Times and other publishers believe they should be compensated for their content that OpenAI uses.
- There may be a need for revenue sharing deals or a royalty scheme in order to utilize large language models without infringing on copyright.
- Google's profitability would not be significantly impacted by paying more for content or less, so the distribution of resources and money is important.
- The Times took legal action because they did not find negotiations with OpenAI productive, and they want to challenge assumptions early on.
- The media industry is struggling to find profitable models, and if there is no partnership or royalty agreement with AI, it could further contract.
- The paywall model may not work if AI can access information regardless, posing a challenge for media companies like the Times.
Browse more from
AI

AI's Impact on Hiring and Huawei Laptop Teardown | Bloomberg Technology

Elon Musk on Advertisers, Trust and the “Wild Storm” in His Mind | DealBook Summit 2023

E167: Nvidia smashes earnings (again), Google's Woke AI disaster, Groq's LPU breakthrough & more

Bloomberg Technology 03/07/2024

Unnatural Language Processing with Emily Foges (Luminance) and Sofie Quidenus-Wahlforss (omni:us)

Microsoft and the UAE's G42 | Bloomberg Technology
Ready to get started?
Save, summarize & chat with your content.
GET STARTED
IT'S FREE
No credit card required · 30 Day Refund on Premium · 24 Hour Support
